🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Staggering Sum in Damages from Euroclear over Seized Assets Russia's monetary authority has stated it is pursuing damages valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This action represents a direct warning by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine. The Substantial Demand According to reports in Russian news outlets, the central bank filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim. European Union officials will determine in the coming days on a plan to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and economic stability. Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth. A Clash Over Legality European Union officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in European jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine. Moscow, however, has labeled any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of retaliatory measures, including confiscating European corporate holdings within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal. Strategic Positioning In comments interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a severe attack on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States." Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian courts. Legal Hurdles Ahead Although courts in European nations are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if such holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm. EU Countermeasures EU officials said they are developing measures to deter other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. They are also designing protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism According to the detailed plan, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected. Kyiv would solely be required to repay the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense damage inflicted during the ongoing war. Alternative Proposals Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget. Such a proposal, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition. Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful signal that when you cause all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."