🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Trend

In Europe, a growing number of nations are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' youth". Legislation could be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to pass a law increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a good starting point," stated the MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "based on strong research".

Previously, interest grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the family of a teenager who died after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," stated a influential peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional government level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some figures to mimic this path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond these regions, other nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

As this international discussion evolves, the policies of this nation and several other countries show that governments internationally are no longer content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.